Staying Healthy in a Challenging World

Cathie Lippman, M.D.

Posted on January 27, 2012

The LA Times this morning reports on a new study showing than about 7% of American teens and adults carry the human papillomavirus in their mouths and this is a probable cause for much of the increase in mouth and throat cancer over the past 25 years.  Where does the HPV in the mouth come from?  From oral sex.  And people believe oral sex is safer than intercourse.  There seemed to be a correlation between the rate of infection and the frequency of oral sex.

Why are some people more affected than others?  As one researcher noted, perhaps the incidence in older people is because their immune systems are weaker.  What were the recommendations?  Education is one and that makes sense.  Inform people that they need to use “protection” for oral sex just as they do for intercourse.  It is possible that the HPV vaccines would be helpful, for boys and for girls, even though we don’t know if they will work for oral cancers.

To this I say “Wait a minute!”  Please understand that I am sympathetic to anyone who is experiencing an illness, including cancer.  My idea of prevention, however, is NOT vaccination.  Vaccines are not without their side effects.  I assume, people being who we are, that oral sex has been around just about as long as humans have existed.  Why now are we seeing more oral cancer?  Why now have we identified more virulent strains of HPV?

Instead of using the FEAR argument: “if you don’t take this vaccine, you are more likely to get cancer,”  how about approaching this from the “love” argument?  I don’t mean more sex.  Sex is not the same as love.  Here I mean love for one’s body.  I mean respect for the intelligence of our body.  We don’t expect our car to last many years without properly caring for them.  The same goes for our body.  People, especially young people, nowadays are not as healthy as previous generations for several reasons.  The food we are eating is not as nourishing, our diets are lousy, we are assaulted by a multitude of new chemicals and toxins humans never had to deal with before, and we don’t get enough sleep.

Read Full Article…

Read the complete article and related information at HPV and oral cancers: the explanation?

Gardasil – the new sexually morality? LB

MedPage Today

By Michael Smith, North American Correspondent, MedPage Today
Published: January 04, 2012
Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.

Most girls who receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine don’t take it as a license for riskier sexual behavior, researchers reported.

In baseline data from a longitudinal study, participants perceived themselves at lower risk for HPV infection after getting the vaccine, according to Tanya Kowalczyk Mullins, MD, of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center in Cincinnati, and colleagues.

But most still said they needed to practice safer sex, Mullins and colleagues reported in the January issue of Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine.

On the other hand, those who saw less of a continued need for safer sex were more likely to have a lower level of knowledge about HPV and the vaccine itself, the researchers reported.

The findings come from a survey taken after the first HPV shot for 339 female participants, ages 13 to 21, in a continuing longitudinal cohort. Some 235 mothers and female guardians were also surveyed.

The girls averaged 16.8 years, 76.4% were black, and 57.5% were sexually active, the researchers reported.

The primary outcome measures were perceived post-vaccination risk of HPV, risk of other sexually transmitted infections, and need for safer sexual behaviors. The researchers also looked to see what factors influenced a perceived lesser need for safer sex.

On 10-point scales, with lower numbers indicating less perceived risk or less need for sexual safety, the researchers found:

• An average score of 5 on the risk-of-HPV scale
• An average of 6.1 on the scale for perceived risk of other sexually transmitted infections
• An average of 8.5 on the scale for perceived need for safer sexual behavior

Read Full Article…

Read the complete article and related information at Girls Who Get HPV Vaccine Still Value Safe Sex

MSN Health

WEDNESDAY, Jan. 4 (HealthDay News) — Nearly one in four girls who gets the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine mistakenly thinks that her risk of getting other sexually transmitted diseases is lowered, a new study indicates.

HPV is the most commonly transmitted sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the United States, with nearly 30 percent of sexually active girls aged 14 to 19 infected. Some virus types can raise the risk for genital warts and cervical cancer.

“I think it’s important to counsel [girls] about what the vaccine protects against,” said lead researcher Dr. Tanya Kowalczyk Mullins, an assistant professor of pediatrics at the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.

The findings were reported in the January issue of the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine.

Two HPV vaccines are now licensed in the United States. One, Gardasil, protects against two HPV strains linked with genital warts and two HPV types linked with cervical cancer. Another vaccine, Cervarix, induces immunity to the two HPV types linked with cervical cancer.

The HPV vaccine is recommended by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for boys and girls aged 11 to 12, with catch-up immunizations recommended to the age of 26 for women and 21 for men.

In the study, Mullins polled 339 girls, average age nearly 17, after their first of three HPV doses, and their mothers. Nearly 60 percent of the girls were sexually experienced.

Mullins wanted to know the girls’ perceived risk of getting HPV after the vaccination, their perceived risk of getting other STIs and their perceived need for continued safer sex behaviors.

“Most girls correctly thought the vaccine does not protect them against STIs other than HPV,” Mullins said.

Read Full Article…

Read the complete article and related information at Many Teen Girls Mistakenly Think HPV Vaccines Cut Risk for All STDs

Study funded by NIH and with research grants given by Merck?  Now what are they up to?  Birth control pills and HPV vaccines and adolescent immaturity do not mix period. Girls think they are ‘safe’ – how wrong they are…. they are being manipulated for their pelvic gold mine. ….. LB.

Reuters

Some adolescent girls who get the HPV vaccine to prevent cervical cancer wrongly think they no longer need to practice safe sex, U.S. researchers said on Monday.

Read the complete article and related information at Some girls overestimate HPV vaccine protection

ThirdAge.com

Boomer Health and Lifestyle

Posted by Claire Shefchik on November 12, 2011 1:30 PM

Vaccinating girls for human papillomavirus (HPV) early in life could reduce the need for later screenings, U.S. and Finnish researchers said Wednesday.

“Provided that organized vaccination programs achieve high coverage in early adolescents before sexual debut, HPV vaccination has the potential to substantially reduce the incidence of cervical cancer, probably allowing the modification of screening programs,” Matti Lehtinen from the University of Tampere in Finland told Reuters.

The first study looked at 20,000 healthy women between 15 and 25 years old from 14 countries worldwide. Researchers found GlaxoSmithKline’s Cervarix vaccine protected effectively against high-grade cervical precancers, early adenocarcinoma, and 12 other types of cancer-causing HPV. The second study showed cross-protection against HPV types 31, 33, 45, and 51. The vaccine partially protects against viruses it is not designed to target, which collectively cause about 85 percent of cases of cervical cancer.

Lehtinen suggested the vaccine could eliminate the need for cervical smear screens every few years in women over the age of 25. In Finland, which implemented an HPV vaccination campaign in 2007, he suggested cutting cervical cancer screening down to just a one test at around age 25.

“You should not have two measures on top of each other if one is already efficient enough,” he told Reuters in a telephone interview. “This could certainly mean lots of savings in terms of costs of screening.”

The study appeared Nov. 9 in The Lancet Oncology.

Read Full Article…

Read the complete article and related information at Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Could Eliminate Cervical Cancer Screening Need: Study

Mail Online
United Kingdom

• Lucy Hinks is unable to walk or talk after having injections at school
• Parents warn others to check on potential side effects of Cervarix vaccine

By Lauren Paxman

Last updated at 4:31 PM on 14th November 2011

A schoolgirl has been left in a ‘waking coma’, too exhausted to open her eyes or speak, after having a cervical cancer vaccine. Last October and again a month later, Lucy Hinks joined her classmates at school in Wigton in Cumbria to have the HPV jab Cervarix as part of a country-wide programme.

By Christmas, she had visited the doctor several times with flu-like symptoms, tiredness and joint pain.

After the third injection of the vaccine, in May this year, Lucy began to experience extreme exhaustion.

Her health has now deteriorated to such an extent that for the past seven weeks she has slept for up to 23 hours day.

Lucy is also unable to walk or even talk to her devastated family.

Today, her mother Pauline and father Steve, who works for Pirelli, reveal the stress their family is enduring and their fears that it could be years before she recovers.

They now care for Lucy – who has lost nearly three stone – around the clock and describe their lives as a ‘living nightmare’.

The couple, from Port Carlisle, Cumbria, are urging parents to find out about the potential side effects of the vaccine, Cervarix.

Their warning comes as thousands of year eight pupils prepare to receive the vaccine in schools.

Mrs Hinks said: ‘I would not wish what we’ve been through on anyone.

‘I’ve not seen the whites of Lucy’s eyes for weeks and nobody can tell us when it will turn.

‘I would urge parents to get all the facts, gather as much information as you can. Decide for yourself if it’s right for your child.’

Read Full Article….

Read the complete article and related information at Girl, 13, left in ‘waking coma’ and sleeps for 23 hours a day after severe reaction to cervical cancer jabs

Press Release

November 11, 2011
By Leslie Carol Botha, Vice-President Public Relations

Gardasil Contaminated with HPV rDNA

In September of this year, SANE Vax Inc. broke the news that 100% of the Gardasil vials tested proved to be contaminated with a recombinant HPV DNA attached to aluminum.  The nonprofit organization contracted with a private lab to run the tests at request of informed physician and medical consumers concerned about HPV vaccine safety and efficacy.  The laboratory informed SANE Vax Inc. that one hundred percent of the thirteen (13) samples of Gardasil™ taken from lots  #1437Z, #1511Z, #0553AA, #NL35360, #NP23400, #NN33070, #NL01490, #NM25110, #NL39620, #NK16180, #NK00140, #NM08120 and #NL13560, currently being  marketed in the U.S.A., Australia, New Zealand, Spain, France, and Poland were found to be positive for HPV rDNA.

In the past month global government health agencies went from demanding that vaccine contamination be investigated – to accepting a universal statement possibly written by Merck – that the agencies were well aware that the ‘presence of DNA fragments was to be expected and did not pose a safety risk. ^1. And life went on as usual.

On October 25, 2011, an advisory panel to the CDC, who actually receives a ‘kick-back’ on Gardasil sales recommended that the vaccine be administered to boys ages 9 to 26 – creating a whole new market for sales and profits.  The recommendation, which falls short of a mandate, means Merck’s Gardasil vaccine could be added to vaccination schedules in pediatricians’ offices across the country.²

Meanwhile – a well-known doctor from Peru, concerned about the safety and efficacy of Gardasil, was scheduled to debate a doctor from Merck at a conference.  Just prior to the scheduled debate, the conference moderator told the audience that the doctor from Merck was in a hurry so he could not stay for the debate regarding the vaccine and instead he would be the first one to address the conferees.

When it was the doctor from Peru’s turn to speak she shared the data and research regarding the contamination of Gardasil with HPV rDNA attached to the aluminum adjuvant. The conference attendees were shocked.

The doctor then accompanied her gynecologist husband to a party for medical professionals and to her great surprise the doctor from Merck was at the gathering.  He of course, was embarrassed to be exposed. When approached by the doctor from Peru he told her that the findings on Gardasil contamination were indeed correct – and the fragments of HPV rDNA did not belong in the vaccine.  And then the ‘good doctor’ tried not to talk to her again that evening.  Perhaps this admission of guilt is the reason he could not or would not debate the vaccination contamination issue?

The Gardasil vaccine controversy reads like a well-scripted science fiction novel since medical professionals and researchers have not yet developed a test to conduct studies on the short-term or long term medical effects of a run-way genetically engineered virus bound to aluminum being injected into the body.

SANE Vax Inc. Concerns

• Does the aluminum adjuvant become the carrier for HPV DNA causing said DNA to remain in the blood and/or organs for an extended length of time?

• Since viral DNA cannot replicate by itself (it needs a host cell) what happens if genetically engineered viral DNA enters a human host cell?
• How will this now ‘genetically-engineered cell’ replicate?  Will it mutate the host cell leading towards cancer?

• How will genetically engineered cells affect the reproductive health of future generations?

• How does the immune system react to the detection of a combination viral DNA and human DNA in what was once a ‘normal’ cell? Will the immune system fight the now genetically engineered human cell?

Can Gardasil Contaminants be Transmitted to Others?

Back in the U.S. Lauren a Gardasil injured teenager – (now adversely affected as long as the purported vaccine’s efficacy – 5 years), was volunteering at a blood drive which left her mother Rosemary, Vice-President of Victim Support wondering ‘If the Gardasil victims are affected by the residue that is in the vaccine, what will it do if they give blood?  Could the recipients of the blood from donors who have had the vaccine be affected by the recombinant HPV DNA?  Can it be transferred via a blood transfusion?’

Rosemary went on to express her concerns to the SANE Vax group that most people who are receiving transfusions are already traumatized and immune-compromised from vehicular or other accidents, surgeries, or poor health conditions.  What will this recombinant HPV DNA virus do to these people?

Of course, this scenario leads to dozens of others scenarios on how blood might be passed from a vaccine contaminated individual to an unsuspecting victim. What if a medical professional is contaminated by a Gardasil recipient during a routine procedure – or standard lab work?   What if a Gardasil recipient is hurt in a fall or traffic accident and a well-meaning bystander rushes to their aid and becomes contaminated from blood from a wound. How would it be possible to track possible transmission routes that might move through the population faster than a speeding bullet?

Gardasil Science Fiction Scenario Unfolds

Let’s add to the unfolding science-fiction scenario. Now that Merck and the government health agencies are aware of the contamination in Gardasil and the ‘good’ doctor’s public admission that the contamination does not belong in the vaccine, what will the pharmaceutical giant do?  What happens if Merck quietly ‘recalls’ contaminated vials of Gardasil and replaces their stockpiles with non-contaminated vials?

How will this affect the millions of adolescents who may have already received the contaminated vaccine? By the time HPV rDNA test protocols are developed – there may no longer be contaminated lots available for study.

Millions could be left wondering what will happen to them as the genetically engineered viral DNA possibly infects more and more host cells in the body. Will they fall victim to a multitude of autoimmune disorders caused by the marauding viral contaminants eroding their immune system? Will their bodies become riddled with ‘cancerous’ cells?   How will the presence of rDNA affect their fertility or the health of future generations?

At this point, no one knows the answers to these questions – and the innocent have truly become human medical experiments.

Take the case of Alexis Wolfe, a teenage girl who became ‘mentally retarded’ post Gardasil vaccination– who is now back in the emergency room, dehydrated – weighing in at 104 pounds and unable to sleep for days. It has been four years since this young girl was vaccinated. Are the genetically engineered viral particles slowly invading every other cell in her body?  Not to mention that emergency rooms are a perfect breeding ground to spread contaminated rDNA blood to unsuspecting medical professionals and patients who are already ill and traumatized.

Perhaps in the interest of public health and safety vials of the contaminated vaccine should be bought by parents with injured children,  researchers and medical professionals so it is possible to develop tests and study the mechanisms of action of viral contaminants attached to aluminum. The purchase of a vial of Gardasil may well indeed hold the only hope for the victims of a vaccine experiment gone bad.

Source:

1. FDA Information on Gardasil – Presence of DNA Fragments Expected, No Safety Risk
http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProducts/ucm276859.htm

2. Gardasil controversy: CDC recommends young boys receive HPV vaccine,
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/10/cdc_recommends_young_boys_rece.html

Read Release here….. http://sanevax.org/contaminated-gardasil-vaccine-may-be-infectious-potentially-causing-millions-more-to-become-sick-via-blood-transference-merck-doctor-admits-contaminant-does-not-belong-in-the-vaccine/

Read the complete article and related information at Contaminated Gardasil Vaccine May Be Infectious – Potentially Causing Millions More to Become Sick via Blood Transference – Merck Doctor Admits Contaminant Does Not Belong in the Vaccine

A while back we shared with you some information which the folks at SaneVax uncovered about Viral HPV DNA contaminant found in the Gardasil HPV Vaccine. This is a problem and DOES post a health threat because aside from the DNA being attached to aluminum which has an affinity for the brain and has been implicated in issues of alzhemiers and neuro degeneration?

‘Recombinant DNA’ is a DNA that has been artificially attached to DNA from another species or a man-made DNA construct, in other words, genetically modified.  ‘Recombinant DNA,’ also known as genetically modified DNA, is considered a biohazard.  This is what states, drug companies, doctors and other medical professionals what you to inject into your children.

Now, the FDA thinks it’s ok, and does not post a threat to your health.

In response to the recent announcement by SANE Vax Inc. of the discovery of genetically modified HPV DNA residue in multiple vials of Gardasil, the FDA posted the following page on their site, FDA Information on Gardasil – Presence of DNA Fragments Expected, No Safety Risk. The FDA lists several ‘key facts’ in an obvious attempt to allay any fears which may have arisen over the discovery of foreign DNA in yet another ‘safe and effective’ vaccine. Unfortunately, these ‘key facts’ raise more questions than answers.

In spite of the fact the FDA claims their mission is, helping the public get the accurate, science-based information they need to use medicines, there are no scientific references and no indication that these ‘key facts’ are anything more than damage control statements. American medical consumers deserve better from an agency funded by taxpayers and entrusted with the mission of being responsible for protecting the public health by assuring the safety, efficacy and security of human and veterinary drugs, biological products, medical devices…… (FDA mission statement)

According to the Consumer Justice Group, in the last 27 years, there have been 31 drugs approved ‘safe and effective’ by the FDA which were subsequently withdrawn from the market due to safety concerns not uncovered during clinical trials. No one will ever know the true cost in human suffering resulting from adverse reactions to these 31 FDA approved ‘safe and effective’ medications.

Medical consumers worldwide are not willing to risk their children’s health and perhaps their very lives on a vaccine that ‘might’ prevent cancer 20 to 30 years down the road. Parents are not willing to wait until the adverse events post Gardasil vaccination reaches the same numbers as Vioxx did before the vaccine is withdrawn from the market.

Medical consumers around the world are no longer willing to accept the FDA’s ‘word’ when it comes to HPV vaccines and their children’s health and safety. They are demanding scientific proof of the claims made by the FDA and vaccine manufacturers.

Click here for more from SANEVax.org.

The Gardasil HPV Vaccine has been in the news as of late due to the Republican debates, Gardasil HPV mandates from states like California stepping on parental rights, and the numerous deaths and other issues of vaccine injury, proving a problem with vaccine safety and Gardasil HPV Vaccine. Add to this the recent post we made about the dangers of the solution the HPV Vaccine is in, it is apparent that the FDA does not hold the public’s health to great care, and sides with Big Pharma.

Read More….

Read the complete article and related information at FDA Sells Out Your Health In Support of Merck and Gardasil HPV Vaccine

Daily Kos

by Kaili Joy Gray

October 30, 2011

The famous Monty Python song Every Sperm is Sacred is about to become a sad reality in Mississippi. Amendment 26, also known as the Personhood Amendment, is simple on its face:

The term ‘person’ or ‘persons’ shall include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning or the functional equivalent thereof.

That means a fertilized egg, like the one pictured to the right, would be recognized as a person under this new law, supposedly with all the same rights and protections as the woman who carries it.

The sponsors of this amendment, which will appear on the Nov. 8 ballot this year, and which is expected to pass, are not shy about stating their reasoning for such an amendment: the amendment sets up a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade in the hopes of seeing it overturned. If a fertilized egg is legally recognized as a person, the thinking goes, then the destruction of a fertilized egg—whether through abortion or even use of certain types of contraception like the IUD and the morning-after pill, which prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in a woman’s uterus—could be recognized as murder, and therefore prosecuted as such.

But that’s not all the proponents of the bill hope to achieve. Earlier this week, The New York Times reported:

“I view it as transformative,” said Brad Prewitt, a lawyer and executive director of the Yes on 26 campaign, which is named for the Mississippi proposition. “Personhood is bigger than just shutting abortion clinics; it’s an opportunity for people to say that we’re made in the image of God.”

Of course, the state has no business making such declarations—that we are made in the image of God—the law of the land. But hardcore believers, like proponents of the Personhood Amendment, seek to destroy the separation between church and state, and they see this amendment as another step in that direction. And of course it would make abortion, contraception and embryonic stem cell research a crime.

Read Full Article…

Read the complete article and related information at The Personhood Amendment: Rights for eggs but not for women

Age of Autism

Government Blames Parents for Low Gardasil Vaccine Uptake & Expands Routine Use for Boys
Merck Strikes Back with Blatant Corporate Influence on Government & Media
It is Time to ‘Occupy Pharma’

By Leslie Carol Botha
Women’s Health Educator
Author & Broadcast Journalist

10.28.11 – See Merck run. The aftermath of the discovery of a genetically engineered virus in 100% of the Gardasil vials tested by SANE Vax Inc. has had global governments running and Merck’s marketing department at a loss for words.¹ That coupled with Michelle Bachmann’s remarks on not getting her daughters vaccinated with Gardasil at the September 12 Republican Party Tea Party debate in front of millions of viewers – and then stating the next day that she met a mother of a now ‘mentally retarded’ injured girl who had received Gardasil.  On October 9 Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 499 into law giving the custody of minors age 12 and over to the State of California for the treatment of STD’s.  All three issues have spotlighted Gardasil and have brought negative attention to Merck’s multi-million dollar award-winning creating a market out of thin air ‘One Less’ campaign.

Merck’s first-round counterattack was to use the media to politically sabotage Bachmann’s chances of becoming a Republican Party candidate.  Headlines raged – Michele Bachmann’s HPV vaccine remarks continue to draw criticism filled with spin and misinformation about Gardasil from the medical profession noticeably funded by Big Pharma – who were placing bets on whether or not Bachmann could produce a mentally retarded Gardasil injured girl followed by erroneous comments from ‘experts’ like Dr. Kenneth Alexander, a pediatric infectious disease expert at the University of Chicago Medical Center who told Reuters “There are people out there who, because of this kind of misinformation, aren’t going to get their daughter immunized. As a result, there will be more people who die from cervical cancer.” ^2. Then Governor Jerry Brown jumped in on the mix by signing AB 499 into law allowing a minor – ages 12 years and older– to ‘consent’ to medical care related to the prevention of a sexually transmitted disease.  Not only does the act violate federal vaccine law, but it casts doubt on the governor’s integrity as he succumbed to Big Pharma pressure, and Merck funding, when he mandated vaccination without parental consent. On October 21, Medical Marketing and Media posted an article titled Despite HPV vax ad bonanza, low awareness and slacker docs dog uptake that reporting only a little more than half of U.S. girls ages 13 to 17 have not gotten even one dose of the HPV vaccine, and among the main reasons are poor awareness and the failure of doctors to recommend vaccination, a study shows. ^3.

Follow that with the Tuesday announcement by the major media networks that the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has recommended that “All males starting at age 11 should receive the HPV vaccine Gardasil to protect themselves against sexually transmitted forms of human papillomavirus, the cause of most cervical and anal cancers as well as most mouth and throat cancers.” ^4. By Wednesday, October 26,the story was on the front page of newspaper around the country from the LA Times to the Herald Tribune in Sarasota, FL.

And the media did not stop there.  In conjunction with the news or vaccinating boys with Gardasil, CBS News reported that the Journal of the American College of Cardiology published an article on October 24 linking HPV to a disease that takes even more American lives – heart disease suggesting that people who have HPV are more than twice as likely to have a heart attack or stroke. ^5.

CBS took up the cry again on October 25 – with their headline CDC Panel Votes to Extend HPV Vaccine to Young Boys and 30 minute video series on the benefits of Gardasil vaccination and the dangers of HPV. ^6.

On October 27, the New England Journal of Medicine newsletter included an article titled HPV Vaccine for Men – citing a study on the ‘safety and efficacy of quadrivalent HPV vaccine (qHPV) against anal intraepithelial neoplasia associated with HPV-6, 11, 16, or 18 infection in men who have sex with men.’ ^7. Needless to say the funding for the study came from Merck and GlaxoSmithKline.

Talk about backlash. Retaliation ain’t education folks.  Merck is on blatant overdrive shoving the Gardasil vaccine down our throats – any which way they can – using their money and their clout with the media and federal and state governments.

Ed Silverman with Pharmalot has uncovered the real reason for the aggressive Merck Gardasil campaign.  In an article posted October 25 titled: Where The Boys Are: Merck, Gardasil And HPV Silverman wrote “Last year, Gardasil sales slowed considerably, from $1.4 billion in 2008 to $988 million, although for the first half of this year, revenue climbed about 10 percent, to $490 million, from a year earlier. Besides controversy, cost has also been a factor – Gardasil costs about $360 for a three-course dose. The drug maker will welcome the increased sales that come with the ACIP recommendation, given that 13,000 jobs are in the process of being eliminated. In fact, Merck employees in numerous locations this week are being notified of pending layoffs.” ^8. >One could speculate that Merck’s marketing department is about be laid off since their ‘One Less Girl to Get Cervical Cancer’ campaign has been countered with a successful ‘One More Girl Adversely Injured’ campaign – conducted by vaccine safety advocates, professional experts and medical professionals who are beginning to speak out about the ‘dangerously completely useless at preventing cervical cancer’ vaccine. ^9.

Let us not forget that the National Cancer Institute has not even linked a causal relationship between the human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. ^10.

Big Pharma and the government have never launched such an egregious campaign on the citizens of the United States. I believe it is time to launch an ‘Occupy Pharma’ campaign and join the tens of millions of people who now belong to the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ campaign to alert more people to the dangerous covert efforts of the pharmaceutical to use fear tactics for compliance. Their actions are despicable and illegal. Big Pharma and the government need to be held accountable for fraud and deception regarding the safety and efficacy of Gardasil.

Source:

Read Full Article…

Read the complete article and related information at It’s Time to Occupy Pharma: Government Blames Parents for Low Gardasil Vaccine Uptake & Expands Routine Use for Boys