Holy Hormones Journal: Menstrual health advocates have been right all along. We saw where this birth control movement was heading… out of the hands of women (who fought so very hard to get the right to control the number of children they brought into the world) and into the hands of men. The patriarchy. The lawmakers.
Who are the real experts on birth control? The largest uncontrolled experiment in medical history? Scientists, doctors? No. Women, yes! We experience the synthetic hormone soup that goes in our body’s and our minds. But the real experts are the historians. People who are able to see history repeat itself… the progression of birth control being a ‘woman’s right’ – to long-acting reversible contraceptives LARC’s now being used to control women.
If you ever doubted you were considered to be nothing more than chattel by the patriarchy – think again. If we do not wave red flags and make every woman, mother, educator, doctor, teen girl aware of the history of this movement and where it is heading – we will be doomed.
This is nothing short of another medical experiment on our babies. What will the outcomes be? Other than protection if raped? Other than being bed down anytime a man desires without fear of pregnancy. Other than….. infertility? Depression, anxiety, weight gain, the list goes on and on.
The proclaimed experts say that LARCs are reversible. But will they be reversible in teen girls whose neuro-endocrine-immune system is not yet developed? There are no studies on this. Short-term or long-term PERIOD.
This type of legislation threatens our medical freedom – I do not care what country you live in. It is unlawful, and immoral and unethical.
This type of legislation threatens parental choice. What if your child is being sterilized without your knowledge or consent? Comes home one day and says “Mommy, I have this funny thing in my stomach.” Or, “Mommy I had a shot today so I will not get pregnant.” How will you feel?
This type of legislation threatens informed consent. How is a teen girl mentally/emotionally mature enough to know the ramifications of the decision to get an IUD or implant inserted, or an injection of progestin – the same type of injection that is used to castrate male sex offenders in prison.
We are fighting for these same freedoms on the vaccine issue. Both of these issues ARE WOMEN’S ISSUES. PERIOD.
We have been holding up reg flags and warning of this day for decades.
And now it is upon us.
We have been awake.
Now it is your turn to wake up – and start reading the history. A lot of it is right here in the Holy Hormones Journal.
Just when I thought I was finished with this post – and I could walk away, my co-author emailed me this article that appeared in The Blaze: UK Police Sacrificed ‘Sex Groomed’ Girls on Altar of Multiculturalism
Are we grooming our girls for sex and a life of forced prostitution?
Proposal to temporarily sterilise all NZ teenage females should raise serious red flags
The Leading Edge Blog
July 1, 2015
Yesterday the NZ media featured coverage of a new proposal that has been put forward by two “senior” academics from the University of Otago, who would like to see all young New Zealand females temporarily sterilised with long-acting chemical contraceptive implants.
In their ideal vision for the future of New Zealand young people, these academics would like temporary sterilisation to be the default policy that young girls would have to deliberately be opted out of if they didn’t want their new and still-developing fertility to be chemically shut down for months or years at a time.
No, this is not the plot of some dystopian novel or film, this really is a policy that a couple of NZ academics apparently now seriously consider to be a good idea.
To put things mildly: there is a lot to be concerned about with this proposal.
Firstly, these academics don’t seemed to have considered the possible impacts that temporarily sterilising an entire population of females from a very young age could have.
As far as I am aware, no attempt at the population-wide temporary sterilisation of very young females, whose physiology is still new and still developing, has ever been attempted – meaning that the outcome of such an experimental scheme is totally unknown.
We are talking here about synthetic hormonal interference with the female fertility system while that system is still very young and developing, and there is no reliable way of knowing how such interference could turn out (for all of us) in the long-run.
We already know that chemical contraceptives are an environmental pollutant that end up in waterways, and from there cause harms to wildlife populations. Imagine how devastating this environmental impact could become if every female in NZ was temporarily sterilised with these agents at a young age?
Then there are the eugenic memories from recent history that make mass sterilisation (even if it is reversible) a very unpalatable idea for most people today – the Nazis experimented with ways of trying to sterilise entire female Jewish populations, and in Apartheid South-Africa a similar sterilisation scheme was attempted on Black Africans.