Grim and Confusing Agendas Behind Gardasil and Cervarix Continue

Holy Hormones Journal:  Not a week goes by without more disturbing news about Gardasil and Cervarix – but now about the efficacy of pap testing?  Keep scratching your heads – because if the new pap smears are defective – and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (ACOG) in 2009 raised pap smear guidelines to age 21 because –

“Adolescents have most of their childbearing years ahead of them, so it’s important to avoid unnecessary procedures that negatively affect the cervix,” says Dr. Waxman. “Screening for cervical cancer in adolescents only serves to increase their anxiety and has led to overuse of follow-up procedures for something that usually resolves on its own.”

gardasil male hand…then what is going on?  This statement by Dr. Waxman is erroneous.  If an adolescent girl has sex she and her partner need to be accountable and responsible.  STD’s are rampant in this demographic – especially with the use of synthetic hormone contraceptives. Adolescents are being put on these hormonal birth control methods before they are even mature enough to advocate condom use for themselves.  Hell, many women of all ages do not have the chutzpa to advocate for themselves.  And once again the men are left out of the equation.

Our colleagues in India also shared information with us about the continued reports of illegal trialling by PATH and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for the unethical HPV vaccine trials in that country.  Journalist Christina England wrote a brilliant article about this debacle in GreenMedInfo: US-Based Agency PATH Violated Law During HPV Vaccine Trials in India.

Indian Parliament Writes Scathing Report Concerning The Conduct of PATH During HPV Vaccine Trials.

On 30th August 2013, The Mail India Online, reported that the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) had allegedly played hand in glove with the US NGO, PATH, to promote the commercial interests of both cervical cancer vaccine manufacturers, which they say were linked to the deaths of several young Indian girls.

Japan is also moving forward to ban the vaccine. In June 2013 the Ministry of Health requested that the package inserts for the HPV vaccines be revised to reflect the reports of adverse injuries.

On September 4, 2013, the Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease issued a press release with the headline –HPV Vaccine: Israel Health Ministry Considers Canceling Vaccination Due to Side Effects.

Rochester, NY (PRWEB) September 04, 2013

The CBCD has learned that “Health Ministry officials (in Israel) are considering canceling plans to administer the HPV vaccine to 52,000 eighth-grade girls, following studies suggesting vaccine-linked autoimmune conditions and other adverse effects (1).”

These studies are causing concern among experts in Israel’s much respected medical community. One such study was conducted by Israeli and Italian medical experts from Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, and Sapienza University of Rome. It was published in July 2013 in the American Journal of Reproductive Immunology (1).

Cannot even imagine what U.S. officials are even thinking are saying right now.  It appears that the game is up – and Merck and the CDC and the FDA need to become transparent and integral and admit to their medical experiment on unsuspecting girls all around the world.

We need to start examining the effects of synthetic hormones on girl’s body – and how they increase the risk of cervical cancer…. Girls need to know how to protect themselves from STD’s – and men need to be more accountable for their participation in the act of sex.

And we need to stop the hundreds of years old cultural ideology that the very fact of being a female is a form of mental illness that needs to be managed and controlled.

More on that in an upcoming blog post.


New Pap Smear Tests Are Defective

Gaia Health
August 29, 2013

The Gardasil & Cervarix situation is far worse than you might have imagined. The one thing that stands between you and deadly cervical cancer is a pap test, but as this report shows, even that has been subverted by the profit imperative that operates in modern medicine & the FDA. Be sure to avoid the new, more expensive pap lab methods, if you value your life. I predict a massive increase in women dying of cervical cancer—which will be used to sell more vaccines. –Heidi Stevenson

by Mark Krause, Cytotechnologist
Originally published in Mesh Medical Device News Desk

I am a laboratory  technician who screens pap smears, a cytotechnologist, cytotech for short, and I believe that fraud is taking place in this pap testsfield as a result of falsely advertised and/or dysfunctional products approved by a scandal-ridden Food and Drug Administration.

Currently most pap smears are no longer smears, they are monolayered preparation.  The cellular material is dropped into a vial containing an alcohol solution. Some mucous and blood are dissolved and debris is removed. The sample is deposited on a slide in a single cellular monolayer. The great majority of cytotechs like it, including myself, as it is easier to read. Apparently the major reason it is in place is because of higher profitability.

The monolayer pap has an apparent dark side. It is advertised as being extraordinarily more accurate than a conventional pap smear. One corporation cites studies claiming accuracy increases of over 100-230 %.  A Dutch-Belgian study, published in 2009 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, found no increases. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concluded the same. An Australian study found an increase of 12 %. I think we may have seen an accuracy increase of 5-10 % at my laboratory. It appears that the manufacturer has major credibility issues with honesty in advertising.

The apparently deceptive advertising may be deliberate for the monolayer pap may have really been designed for an FDA approved, computerized microscope. One is advertised as being approximately 20-45 % more accurate than a cytotech alone.  Our lab did not see any accuracy increases. Studies in Australia, Ireland and USA concluded the same.  More dishonest advertising?  Apparently the device is highly profitable. It significantly increases the cost of the pap test.

After our lab procured the computerized microscope , we were alarmed by the tendency of the device to miss abnormal cellularity if present in large clusters. We also noticed that the device tended to zero in on air bubbles, chips in the glass, dirt, dark colored benign cells or just blank space. In many cases, abnormal cellularity seemed to be found by accident. The artificial intelligence of the device appears slipshod. Sometimes the device finds abnormal cells quite well, but this is an exception, in my experience. In my opinion, the device is not worth the money spent on it.

Then we wondered:  How could this device have gotten past the scrutiny of the FDA? Ideas surfaced. In April 2008, a Readers Digest article, Can We Trust The FDA? , the author claims the FDA is the best agency the pharmaceutical industry can buy and said  the agency is lurching from one disaster to the next , one shocking lapse after another. A CBS author wrote in Money Watch, March 10, 2010, that the FDA is riddled with politics, conflicts of interest and outright corruption. Later citing issues of data manipulation and harassment of whistle blowers. The New York Times, on July 15 , 2012, exposed a massive FDA  spying  debacle of some 80,000 pages involving the unit that investigates medical devices.

Alleged FDA impropriety and incompetence may have allowed harmful medical devices to be marketed. A whistleblower lawsuit claims FDA scientists warned that the agency approved colonoscopy and mammography instrumentation that delivered dangerous  radiation doses . Those scientists were spied upon and fired.  In their book, The Battle Over Health Care, authors Gibson and Singh point out that of the high-risk medical devices recalled by the FDA, 75 % were never evaluated. Some 20 % of cardiac defibrillators were recalled and hundreds died due to malfunctions. Many cytotechs suspect that the computerized microscope was rubber stamp approved because of some combination of corporate financial hooliganism and FDA absentmindedness.

Read full article…


Author: Leslie Carol Botha

Author, publisher, radio talk show host and internationally recognized expert on women's hormone cycles. Social/political activist on Gardasil the HPV vaccine for adolescent girls. Co-author of "Understanding Your Mood, Mind and Hormone Cycle." Honorary advisory board member for the Foundation for the Study of Cycles and member of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research.

Speak Your Mind