Young Metrosexuals Get Better Grades

Miller-McCune.com

Researchers from the University of Miami show that well-groomed high school students have higher grade point averages than their slovenly classmates.

By: Tom Jacobs | May 05, 2009

Do your teenagers spend a lot of time primping in front of the mirror in an attempt to look their best? If so, rejoice: They may be hogging the bathroom, but the results are well worth it. According to newly published research, well-groomed high school students have higher grade point averages than their slovenly classmates.

In a new study published in the journal Labour Economics, a team led by sociologist Michael T. French of the University of Miami examined the impact of physical attractiveness, personality and grooming on high schoolers’ cumulative GPA. They used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, a massive undertaking which included in-home interviews with 20,745 adolescents from 80 American high schools and 52 middle schools. The interviewers rated each student’s physical attractiveness, personality attractiveness and grooming on a 1-to-5 scale.

The researchers discovered “a statistically significant grade premium for well-groomed male and female students,” as well as “an even larger penalty” for poorly groomed males.

“The grade premiums and penalties generated for grooming for male students are larger than those for female students,” they report. On the other hand, “Female students with pleasant personalities also receive a grade premium.”

The scholars provide two possible explanations for this phenomenon. “Female students who appear personable to the (study’s) interviewers and who are well-groomed may be choosing to conform to adult expectations,” they note. “As part of this effort, they may also be investing more time in schoolwork instead of socializing. … The same type of mechanism can help explain the results for male students.”

They add that “teacher bias in favor of or against certain types of students” may also help explain these findings. While they were “not able to conclusively determine” whether such prejudice is a significant factor, it’s easy to imagine teachers who —consciously or unconsciously — look more favorably at the kid with polished shoes than the one with greasy hair.

Either way, the researchers add, “we find that personal appearance matters at a relatively young age,” noting that grade point average is a key factor in getting into a good college. So some solid advice for high school students might be to hit the books —and then hit the showers. And don’t forget to mousse.

Comment from Leslie

Well, this is a no-brainer – and maybe even just a little discriminatory. Metrosexual’s diets are better, chances are they are more financially stable, obviously they have the designer clothes and are looked up to – and therefore have a higher self-esteem…which can all translate to higher scholastic achievement levels…if they choose.

Slovenly kids – may not have stable financial resources, their diets maybe lacking – their self-esteem is probably low – and they may be reacting to living in the box with their metro peers. In other words at-risk youth. Remember what happened at Columbine?

I have worked with many adolescent teens in treatment programs – who would fall under the above slovenly classification – and found out that they are actually brilliant in their own right. They just look at life differently.

Once they are acknowledged for the gifts that they do have – it is amazing how their self-esteem increases, their behaviors and dress style change – and they begin to excel at their school work.

The moral of the story is – “Never judge a book by its cover.”

One last adage:

“A weed is a plant whose virtue has not yet been discovered.” Emerson

PG

Author: Leslie Carol Botha

Author, publisher, radio talk show host and internationally recognized expert on women's hormone cycles. Social/political activist on Gardasil the HPV vaccine for adolescent girls. Co-author of "Understanding Your Mood, Mind and Hormone Cycle." Honorary advisory board member for the Foundation for the Study of Cycles and member of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research.