Cancer guidelines anger survivors

The Detroit News
Advocates slam proposals for later, fewer screenings
Kim Kozlowski
December 10, 2009

After a decade of breast self-examinations, Cathy Sullivan discovered a lump at age 40. Tests later confirmed she had breast cancer.

Following surgery and treatment, Sullivan is now cancer-free. But she wonders what would have happened if she had followed a new federal recommendation that no longer recommends breast self-examinations.

“I may not be here today,” said Sullivan of Royal Oak.

Women, Compliance And Medicine

The Huffington Post

November 24, 2009

by Susan Kim Playwright, TV writer. Author: “Flow: The Cultural Story of Menstruation” w/Elissa Stein

When I was a teenager, I was a candy striper at my local hospital. This was admittedly not from a selfless desire to help others, but was a desperate attempt to bulk up my nonexistent extracurricular resume. That being said, I did learn useful things, such as how to push a wheelchair into an elevator without tipping it over and how to water flower arrangements. I also first heard of the term “compliance,” the readiness with which a patient follows medical advice. This reinforced feelings I had secretly already formed about doctors and experts in general. Compliant patients were the good ones, the winners who got better. Woe to those who went their feckless ways, disregarding the expertise of others!

Cancer industry abandons science to keep pushing mammograms that harm women

Natural News

Monday, November 23, 2009
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

The cancer industry has blatantly abandoned science these past two weeks by insisting women under 50 should receive annual mammograms even though the industry’s own scientific task force concluded that such screenings result in too many false positives. Essentially, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force took a good, hard look at the science and concluded that mammograms harm far more women than they help (for women under 50, anyway). But when they announced the new recommendations that women under 50 should avoid mammograms — and women over 50 should only get them every other year — the cancer industry cried foul.

Radiologists, oncologists, Big Pharma pill-pushers and cancer industry non-profits all banded together to declare, “We are abandoning the science! We want more mammograms for more women, science be damned!”

The Myth of the Mammogram

Why many American women are resolutely rejecting the new mammogram recommendations, despite mixed reaction in the medical community.
Newsweek
By Pat Wingert | Newsweek Web Exclusive
Nov 20, 2009

Most adult women know a woman in her 40s who was diagnosed with breast cancer and died. So the news this week that mammograms and self–breast exams do little to protect women under 50 against breast cancer—and that doctors have nothing new to offer in their stead—felt like a real slap to women who have been diligently doing everything they were told to do to protect themselves.

In Reversal Panel Urges Mammograms at 50, Not 40

NY Times
November 16, 2009

Most women should start regular breast cancer screening at age 50, not 40, according to new guidelines released Monday by an influential group that provides guidance to doctors, insurance companies and policy makers.

Cancer Screening: Does It Really Save Lives?

NaturalNews

Monday, July 06, 2009 by: Dr. Julian Whitaker

Anne is a good patient. She sees her doctor for regular checkups, has yearly mammograms, Pap tests, and colon cancer screenings, and she even paid for a full-body CT scan out of her own pocket. She figures she’s doing everything she can to make sure she doesn’t get cancer.

Truth is, Anne is doing nothing to prevent cancer. Although cancer screening is billed as a preventive service that saves lives, the best it can do is detect disease in its early stages, when it is supposedly easier to treat. Nevertheless, every year millions of Americans dutifully line up for their screenings, completely unaware that they may be doing more harm than good.

Americans Exposed to Atomic Bomb Levels of Radiation

Through Medical Imaging, CT Scans, Mammograms NaturalNews.com March 4, 2009 A new report released by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement reveals that Americans’ exposure to radiation has increased more than 600 percent over the last three decades. Most of that increase has come from patients’ exposure to radiation through medical imaging scans Continue Reading …

Kaiser Health Disparities Report: A Weekly Look At Race, Ethnicity And Health

KaiserNetwork.org Science & Medicine | Studies Released at Conference Examine Racial, Ethnic Cancer Disparities [Feb 06, 2009]       The following summarizes news coverage of studies presented this week at the American Association for Cancer Research’s Science of Cancer Health Disparities conference in Carefree, Ariz. Cancer survivors: Black and Hispanic cancer survivors are twice as likely as whites Continue Reading …

Breast Cancer Rates Soar after Mammograms

Some Cancers may Heal Naturally NaturalNews December 7, 2008 A report just published in the Journal of the American Medical Association’s Archives of Internal Medicine (Arch Intern Med. 2008;168[21]:2302-2303) reaches a startling conclusion. Breast cancer rates increased significantly in four Norwegian counties after women there began getting mammograms every two years. In fact, according to Continue Reading …

Why Not Prevent Breast Cancer?

Is finding a “Cure” the best and highest use of our intention? A friend sent me this image yesterday, with the message, “From her cute lips to God’s ear.” I smiled and sent the e-mail on to my writing partner, Leslie. But last night, as I fell asleep, I thought about the e-mail’s real message. Continue Reading …