False accusations of Munchausen by Proxy, The Truth Behind the Label: Part 6 – Panoramic Views

Christina England
Vactruth.com

04/10/2010

(Part: 1 | Part: 2 | Part: 3 | Part: 4 | Part: 5 | Part: 6)

Panoramic Views

I recently came across a group of Professionals who call themselves PACA which is Professionals Against Child Abuse. PACA is a group of professionals who work in child protection who are there for one another. This group came together after several high profile cases where paediatricians and professionals had cases against them at the GMC. The homepage of their website says:

“Welcome to PACA

PACA (Professionals Against Child Abuse) is an association of professionals who care for children that came together in 2007 in response to several high-profile cases against paediatricians at the GMC”.

False accusations of Munchausen by Proxy, The Truth Behind the Label: Part 5 – Facts from Fantasy

Christina England
Vactruth.com

04/09/2010

(Part: 1 | Part: 2 | Part: 3 | Part: 4 | Part: 5 | Part: 6)

Facts from Fantasy

The fact will always remain that MSBP type child abuse does exist and not all cases are false. In this proven case, a mother injected faeces into the child’s bloodstream.

Mother injects baby with faeces

False accusations of Munchausen by Proxy, The Truth Behind the Label: Part 4 – My Story and the Stigma of False Accusations a After Vaccine Injury

Christina England
Vactruth.com
04/08/2010

(Part: 1 | Part: 2 | Part: 3 | Part: 4 | Part: 5 | Part: 6)

My Story and the stigma of false accusations a after vaccine injury

With an accusation of MSBP comes suspicion, stigma, prejudice and discrimination. I was wrongly accused of MSBP in late 1999 and my children were both put on the “at risk register” by Social Services in early 2000. I remember the first case conference as if it was yesterday. I was alone and taken into a room of around twenty professionals, most of whom I had never even met. I was subjected a whole morning of interrogation. My whole life and that of my children was put under a magnifying glass. It felt like I was named and shamed. I was guilty before I even set foot in that building.

False accusations of Munchausen by Proxy, The Truth Behind the Label: Part 3 – A Failing Justice System

Christina England
Vactruth.com

04/07/2010

(Part: 1 | Part: 2 | Part: 3 | Part: 4 | Part: 5 | Part: 6)

A failing justice system

The justice system is fraught with difficulties for an accused person. The odds are always stacked up against them due to failures in legal aid [ as established by the case of Steel and Morris v UK that showed the unavailability of legal aid in defamation cases.

Lawyers are so expensive that they are now reserved for the rich. This is explained by the defence attorney Ryan in Sick Kids

False accusations of Munchausen by Proxy, The Truth Behind the Label: Part 2 – Vaccines, a differential viewpoint

Christina England
Vactruth.com

04/06/2010

(Part: 1 | Part: 2 | Part: 3 | Part: 4 | Part: 5 | Part: 6)

Vaccines, a differential viewpoint

For many years professionals have been linking adverse reactions to vaccines with autism, neurological disorders, sudden infant death and symptoms mimicking those of shaken baby syndrome, however, professionals are now also linking adverse reactions to vaccines with a rise in false allegations of child abuse. These come in the guise of MSBP, SBS and murder after a child dying of SIDS.

Are mothers natural protectors or baby killers?

Shaken Baby Syndrome and vaccines
American Chronicle

by Christina England

January 25, 2010

For many years around the world, doctors, scientists and professors of medicine have been debating as to whether ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome’ or SBS as it is known, actually exists. For a diagnoses of SBS a baby will need to display a serious acquired brain injury, which is said to be caused when a frustrated or angry adult holds an infant or toddler by the trunk or arms and shakes back and forth in a jerking, whiplash motion. Most cases occur in children under one year of age, although there are documented cases of SBS in older children.

Shaken Baby Syndrome Diagnosis On Shaky Ground

by Viera Scheibner, PhD
Published in the “Journal of Australasian College of Nutritional & Environmental Medicine”, Vol. 20 No. 2; August 2001

ABSTRACT

An epidemic of accusations against parents and baby sitters of Shaken Baby Syndrome is sweeping the developed world. The United States and the United Kingdom are in the forefront of such questionable practice. Brain (mainly subdural, less often subarachnoid) and retinal haemorrhages, retinal detachments, and rib and other bone ‘fractures’ are considered pathognomic. However, the reality of these injuries is very different and well documented: the vast majority occur after the administration of childhood vaccines and a minority of cases are due to documented birth injuries and pre-eclamptic and eclamptic states of the mothers.

Shaken baby syndrome itself is put on trial in Fairfax court

Washington Post
By Tom Jackman

Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 19, 2010

As a criminal trial in Fairfax County tries to determine who, or what, caused 4-month-old Noah Whitmer’s brain hemorrhage, the debate over whether “shaken baby syndrome” exists has erupted into a national battle of the experts.

Most criminal trials focus on what the defendant did and didn’t do. But in this case, the complicated matter of what’s humanly possible is at center stage.

Child Protection stole Christmas from families around the world with SBS accusations

American Chronicle

December 30, 2009

by Christina England

Christmas time is a time for families and a time for children but sadly many families this year faced a Christmas without their children because child protection agencies and paediatricians misdiagnosed very real conditions, opting instead to accuse parents of shaking their babies. As a result many families could not join in the seasons festivities with the children they love, they could not buy them presents or prepare their Christmas stockings and some were left with no idea where their children were or even who they were with. One such family is Zabeth and Paul Baynes, their children were removed from their care on October 22, 2007 after they say they were falsely accused of Shaken Baby Syndrome.

Mother wrongly convicted in infant’s death acquitted

Court tells Sherry Sherrett-Robinson it was ‘profoundly regrettable’ that she was convicted and jailed for crime she didn’t commit.
The Globe and Mail

By Kirk Makin

December 7, 2009

The ranks of the wrongly convicted grew by one Monday as an Ontario woman who served a year in jail for the death of her baby boy was acquitted of infanticide by the Ontario Court of Appeal.

After hearing a joint submission in favour of Sherry Sherrett-Robinson by the Crown and defence, the court told the 34-year-old woman it was “profoundly regrettable” that she was wrongly convicted based on errors by Charles Smith, who was once the toast of the pathology community.