Tasmanian girls urged to get immunized against cervical cancer: Where is the common sense?

What criteria do governments use to decide whether the benefits of a vaccine outweigh the risks? On what basis do they judge whether a vaccine should be ‘recommended’ or ‘mandated?” Does common sense enter the equation?

SANE Vax, Inc.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

PRLog (Press Release)– Dec 13, 2010 – Friday, 10 December 2010, Dr. Roscoe Taylor, Director of Public Health, issued a press release urging “all teenage girls in Tasmania to be vaccinated against the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) which causes cervical cancer.”The SaneVax Team believes this strategy makes no sense at all.Let’s ignore the fact no one will know if HPV vaccines actually prevent cervical cancer for at least ten years.

Let’s ignore the fact no one knows when booster shots will be required.

Let’s ignore the fact cervical cancer is not a contagious disease.

Let’s ignore the fact almost 90%, of HPV infections clear on their own with no medical intervention and no symptoms.

Let’s ignore the fact good gynecological care has substantially reduced the risk of cervical cancer in developed countries, and continues to do so.

Let’s even ignore the fact HPV vaccination does not eliminate the need for good gynecological care.

Let’s ignore the fact that every vaccine carries some sort of risk to future health and possibly life.

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, there are approximately 503,300 people residing in Tasmania. 6.5% of these are teenage girls, or approximately 32,700. The most recent Tasmanian Cancer Registry data show that there were only 21 cases of cervical cancers diagnosed and seven deaths in 2007.

Using a conservative estimate of $300 per series of HPV vaccinations, it will cost $9.8 million to inoculate 32,700 girls in an attempt to save 7 lives that could have been saved with regular visits to the gynecologist and proper follow-up when abnormal cells were detected.

The SaneVax Team wants to know how the Australian government can possibly justify the expenditure of such a vast amount of public money gambling on the fact HPV vaccinations will be effective ten or fifteen years down the road.  Research states it will be 20 years before it is known whether the HPV vaccines will have impacted cervical cancer rates. Is it worth gamble when innocent lives may be affected from adverse reactions and/or death?

Sources:

* View Dr. Taylor’s press release here:  http://www.media.tas.gov.au/release.php?id=31195

* View info from Australian Bureau of Statistics here:
http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/3235.0~ …

* View Diane Harper’s comments here: http://www.naturalnews.com/027196_cancer_cervical_cancer …

# # #

SaneVax believes only Safe, Affordable, Necessary & Effective vaccines and vaccination practices should be offered to the public. Our primary goal is to provide scientific information/resources for those concerned about vaccine safety, efficacy and need.For more information, see http://sanevax.org
PG

Author: Leslie Carol Botha

Author, publisher, radio talk show host and internationally recognized expert on women's hormone cycles. Social/political activist on Gardasil the HPV vaccine for adolescent girls. Co-author of "Understanding Your Mood, Mind and Hormone Cycle." Honorary advisory board member for the Foundation for the Study of Cycles and member of the Society for Menstrual Cycle Research.